Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1962No. 741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Appellant in his brief enumerates five questions presented by the appeal. Each is discussed only so far as necessary to dispose of the present appeal.

1. Was proper notice of the hearing below given, and, if not, were sufficient facts shown to dispense with the necessity for such notice?

The answer is yes. The complaint alleges: Plaintiff and defendant were residents of Horry County, S. C., temporarily residing in Ala-mance County, where defendant has property and business interests. Defendant, on 8 September 1961, without cause or excuse, abandoned plaintiff.

The record discloses these…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Scott v. Life Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Kiplinger v. KiplingerSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Mercer v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. State v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. United States v. Mary Louise Seay, A/K/A Mary Louise DerringerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Rogers v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
  5. United States v. Mary Louise Seay, A/K/A Mary Louise DerringerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API