New Hanover County v. . Sidbury
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The defendant excepts to (1) the refusal of the court below to permit his counsel to appear for him at the hearing on the motion for judgment by default final and (2) the signing of judgment without granting defendant an opportunity to file answer. The exceptions must be sustained.
A party may appear either in person or by counsel. G. S., 1-11. The statutory provision is in the alternative. It simply means that a litigant may not appear both in propria persona and by counsel at one and the same time. It cannot be construed to mean that he may not first appear in person and then later through…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abernethy v. . BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- McClamroch v. Colonial Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bank of Pinehurst v. DerbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. PhillipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Lizarríbar v. Martínez GelpíSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Hamlin v. HamlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.