Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
VANESSA D. GILMORE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pending before the Court are Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”)’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint (Instrument No. 112) and Uber’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Instrument No. 129).
I. FACTUAL SUMMARY & PROCEDURAL POSTURE
A. Statement of the Case
This is a suit for false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), brought by taxicab permit-holders in Houston and San Antonio, Texas, against Uber. Uber is a selfdescribed mobile-based transportation network company (“TNC”) based in San Francisco, California,…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boltex Mfg. Co. v. Ulma Piping U.S. Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- AT&T Mobility LLC v. T-Mobile USA IncDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
- Accresa Health LLC v. Hint Health Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2020
- American Trigger Pullers LLC v. WyldeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Colorado Biolabs Inc v. Three Arrows Nutra LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.