Legal Opinion

Boltex Mfg. Co. v. Ulma Piping U.S. Corp.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 28, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-1400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW S. HANEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs Boltex Manufacturing Company, LP and Weldbend Corporation (hereinafter referred to respectively as "Boltex" and "Weldbend" or collectively as "Plaintiffs") have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 97 [redacted version]; 98 [sealed version]; 106 [corrected redacted version] ). Defendants Ulma Forja S. Coop. and Ulma Piping USA Corp. (hereinafter referred to as "Ulma" or "Defendants") have filed a Response (Doc. No. 110). Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Reply in support (Doc. Nos. 128 [redacted version]; 129 [sealed version] ).1

I…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. T-Mobile USA IncDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023
  2. Saekyu Oh, an individual, and Oh, DMD, Inc. f/k/a Saekyu Oh, DMD, Dental Corp., a California corporation v. Smile Land Family Dental, PLLC d/b/a Smile Land Family Dental, a Texas professional limited liability company, and Bassam Abdulnaim Abazid, an individualDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API