Legal Opinion

General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hamm

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1942No. File No. 8528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an action by an assignee to recover on an account for merchandise sold and delivered to Claude L. Hamm by the Rapid City Tire and Tread Company, a corporation. Subsequent to the commencement of the action the defendant died and the administratrix of his estate was substituted as the party defendant. Verdict and judgment were entered for defendant. The assignments predicate error upon the adverse rulings of the court upon plaintiff’s motions for a directed verdict and for judgment n.o.v. and upon certain of the court’s instructions. Respondent has not filed an answering brief in this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Peters v. LohrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Radtke v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Weeks v. Prostrollo Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Williams v. Wessington Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lunde v. DwyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Thompson v. Hannah Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Seco, Inc. v. Gauvey Rig & Trucking CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API