Legal Opinion

People v. Kent

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1949No. Crim. 2557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Defendant appeals in propria persona from a judgment on a verdict finding him guilty on three counts of robbery of the first degree. He also appeals from the order denying him a new trial.

In his opening brief the appellant did not question the sufficiency of the evidence on any one of the counts. Two points were raised by him: (1) The sufficiency of the allegations of the information, and (2) the propriety of the jury’s finding of first degree robbery in view of no specific allegation of the degree charged.(1) The first count of the information accused defendant “of a felony, to wit, robbery,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. O'NEALCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. People v. FallaiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. People v. SummersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. People v. IsraelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. People v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. PerhabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API