Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1963No. Crim. 4352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Appellant, having been convicted of robbery, makes several points which can be considered briefly with whatever statement of facts is required under the separate points, and without recitation of the long story related by the witnesses. Appellant’s contentions and our decisions are:

1. That the information did not state that the robbery was committed with a deadly weapon, but the verdict was of first degree. The information was sufficient and it was for the jury to determine the degree. (People v. Kent, 90 Cal.App.2d 77 [202 P.2d 376].)

2. That the evidence is insufficient to show use of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. People v. NavarroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. People v. SalcidoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. Brandon T.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. LeBlancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. People v. PruittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API