Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fallai

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1929No. Docket No. 1528PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Appellant, having been convicted of robbery in the second degree, has appealed from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial. One of the several grounds urged for reversal is that the trial court erred in allowing the information to be amended at the commencement of the trial.

Before amendment the information read as follows: “ . . . Humbert Fallai is accused by the District Attorney of the said County of Alameda- ... of the crime of felony, to wit, robbery, in that on or about the 4th day of March, Á. D. 1928, at the said County of Alameda, State of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. SampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. People v. PiscitellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. People v. ShelestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. BeeslyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. People v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. FlohrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. IsraelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API