Legal Opinion

McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1959No. 45964PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HYDE, Presiding Judge.

This suit was begun by Arthur G. Ar-buckle, a minor, by next friend, against McDonnell Aircraft Corporation and its Superintendent, hereinafter referred to as McDonnell, for damages for personal injuries. It resulted in a judgment against' McDonnell which was settled for $32,100. McDonnell seeks to recover this amount, with interest and costs, from Arbuckle’s employer Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Company, hereinafter called Hartman, on a third party petition. The issues between Arbuckle and McDonnell were severed and tried separately with the result above stated.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  5. In Re Claim of Dependents of Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Whitehead & Kales Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API