Legal Opinion

Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 27, 1984No. 55,655PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*389The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.:

Plaintiff, Carol Lynn Wooderson, brought this action in the District Court of Sedgwick County for damages for personal injuries which she claims resulted from her ingestion, over a period of years, of the oral contraceptive Ortho-Novum 1/80, manufactured by the defendant, Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (Ortho). At the conclusion of a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict and the court entered judgment for plaintiff and against Ortho for actual damages of $2,000,000 and punitive damages of $2,750,000. Ortho appeals. The primary issues…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Brown v. KeillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. Eck v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Pittman v. Upjohn Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1994

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API