Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided October 30, 2002No. 5:02-cv-00001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOWARD, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Both parties responded to these cross motions and this matter is ripe for adjudication.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), plaintiff Joanne Conrad instituted this action against Continental Casualty Company (“CCC”) to recover long term disability benefits under an ERISA-governed employee welfare plan. Plaintiff contends that CCC wrongfully denied her long term disability…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Neumann v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Stanford v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Boyd v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of BostonDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Matos v. Lorillard Tobacco Co. Group Disability Insurance PlanDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004