Legal Opinion

Barker v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1915No. 5170PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by W. M. Wiseman and another against O. S. Barker and Polly and Jackson Simons, Barker having occupied the land in controversy as a tenant of Polly Simons. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring, error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion-by

ROBBERTS, C.

This case comes here on appeal from the district court of Seminole county. The case was originally commenced on the 20th day of November, 1909, by the defendants in error, Wm. Wiseman and James H. Cobb, as an ordinary action in ejectment to recover the west half of the southeast quarter and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 24, township 9, range 7 east, in said county. To the original petition the defendants, who are plaintiffs in error herein, filed a general denial. It appears from the record that, after the issues were thus joined, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Bruner Et Ux. v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Stone v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKeever v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Hunter v. BattiestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Henley v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Marshall v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API