Legal Opinion

Henley v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 18, 1916No. 5630PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error from,■ District Court, Muskogee County; R. D. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by Sarah Henley, nee Taylor, against Fred W. Davis and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This is an action commenced in the district court of Muskogee county on March 5, 1912, by Sarah Henley against Fred W. Davis, Harry Pearsons, and O. V. Taft, for the possession of certain lands and damages for their detention, etc. The case was tried to the court, and resulted in a general finding and judgment for defendants.

The plaintiff is an enrolled Creek freedman citizen, to whom the lands involved were allotted. On August 25, 1909, in consideration of $800, she executed and delivered to Fred W. Davis a warranty deed describing 40 acres of her allotment, and on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Anderson v. CarkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Maharry v. EatmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Scott v. BrakelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. McKeever v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Chupco v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Hope v. FoleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API