Legal Opinion
Grimm v. Grimm
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 16, 2004No. AC 23901PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*43 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
“The tortured history of this case demonstrates the detrimental effect that procedural dysfunction in a marital dissolution action can have on the judicial process.” Grimm v. Grimm, 74 Conn. App. 406, 407, 812 A.2d 152, (2002), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 911, 821 A.2d 766 (2003). In this appeal, the defendant, Robert L. Grimm, claims that (1) General Statutes § 46b-40 (c) (l)1 violates the free exercise of religion clauses of the federal and state constitutions,2 (2) the trial court improperly concluded that the parties’ marriage had irretrievably broken down and precluded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Ehrenkranz v. EhrenkranzConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Advanced Financial Services, Inc. v. Associated Appraisal Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Montoya v. MontoyaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- City of New Haven v. TuchmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Singh v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.