Legal Opinion
City of New Haven v. Tuchmann
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 21, 2006No. AC 26088PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Norman Tuchmann, appeals from the judgment of the trial court increasing the amount of compensation payable to him in connection with the condemnation of certain of his real property by the plaintiff city of New Haven. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion for a mistrial and (2) considered certain evidence in determining the fair market value of the property.1 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The subject property, owned by the defendant, is at 56 River Street in New Haven. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Lo Sacco v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Abington Ltd. Partnership v. HeubleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LeBlanc v. New England Raceway, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- 36 DeForest Avenue, LLC v. CreadoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Motiva Enterprises, LLC v. Town of StratfordConnecticut Superior Court · 2007
- City of New Haven v. TuchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.