Legal Opinion
Singh v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 28, 2009No. AC 30228PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in opening the record after the close of evidence but before the court rendered its decision. The plaintiff, Harbajan Singh, claims that the court improperly granted the motion filed by the defendant, the city of Harford, to open the record after the close of evidence. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to our disposition of the plaintiffs appeal. On June 13, 2002, the plaintiff was the high bidder at a tax lien sale for a property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Fahey v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Grimm v. GrimmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SaundersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- State v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Jacobson v. A1Z7, LLC (In re Jacobson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Silverstein v. CAMPOSEOConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In re Bjerke Zoning Permit DenialSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014