Legal Opinion
City of New York v. International Pipe & Ceramics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 10, 1969No. Motion Nos. 5 and 6, Docket 32555PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff “The City of New York, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New York, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated” brings this action as the representative of a class (Rule 23, F.R.Civ.Pr.) consisting of “all state and municipal governments, government agencies, authorities and subdivisions in the United States * * * ” ** The defendants are manufacturers and sellers of “low-pressure” and “non-pressure” concrete pipe, allegedly sold to governmental agencies pursuant to a conspiracy in violation of the antitrust laws of the United States. This…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Fischer v. KletzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968
- Kronenberg v. Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Doe v. Commonwealth's Atty. for City of RichmondDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1975
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- In Re Piper Aircraft Distribution System Antitrust Litigation. Van-S-Aviation Corporation v. Piper Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Elliott v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.