Legal Opinion
Haas v. Pittsburgh National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 25, 1975No. 74-2190PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents novel issues of great importance to credit cardholders and the banking industry in Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs challenge the method by which three national banks computed the service charge on their customers’ Master Charge and BankAmericard revolving charge accounts prior to the institution of this class action. At issue are *1086the maximum lawful rate of service charge and the “previous balance” method of determining the balance on which the service charge is imposed.
Plaintiff Haas instituted suit on November 13, 1972, against…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Zimmerman v. HBO Affiliate GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Clark v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Satterwhite v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.