Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2005No. 02-2340PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.

This is the second appeal in this case. Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre and Eleno Aguirre (collectively referred to as the Aguirres) filed a motion pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 seeking the return of over 205 items of personal property which they allege the government seized from them but never properly forfeited. On the recent remand, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the government and denied the Aguirres’ motion for partial summary judgment. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.

I. Background

Gab…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Rodriguez-AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Blue Circle Cement, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of RogersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosales-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Petrella v. BrownbackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Clymore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. CopemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. ParsonsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API