Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodriguez-Aguirre
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2001No. 00-2337PublishedCited by 140 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre, Eleno Aguirre, Doloras Contreras and Tony Bencomo appeal from the district court’s denial of their Rule 41(e) motion for the return of property. The property in question was allegedly seized in 1992 pursuant to several warrants executed on homes and business properties owned by Appellants. While many of the seized items were forfeited by the United States in valid civil forfeiture actions, Appellants allege that approximately 127 of the seized items were never properly forfeited and thus should b'e returned to Appellants. The…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Ibinga Bertin v. United States of America, Docket No. 05-4503-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- David A. Morlan v. Universal Guaranty Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Teamsters & Employers Welfare Trust of Illinois v. Gorman Brothers Ready MixCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. $148,840.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.