Legal Opinion

United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, Land

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1993No. 91-781PublishedCited by 232 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Stevens

The question presented is whether an owner’s lack of knowledge of the fact that her home had been purchased with the proceeds of illegal drug transactions constitutes a defense to a forfeiture proceeding under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, § 511(a), 84 Stat. 1276, as amended, 21 U. S. C. § 881(a)(6).1

I

On April 3, 1989, the Government filed an in rem action against the parcel of land in Rumson, New Jersey, on which respondent’s home is located. The verified complaint alleged that the property had been purchased in 1982 by respondent with funds provided by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by232 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. DaccarettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. James J. Giuffre v. Nicholas Bissell Richard Thornburg Robert Smith Russ Leffert Sam Debella Richard Meyers County of SomersetCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Luis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API