Legal Opinion
De Bruyn Produce Co. v. Romero
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 18, 1993No. Docket 138771PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
Defendants appeal as of right from a declaratory judgment. We affirm.
De Bruyn Produce Company is involved in the growing, harvesting, packing, and shipping of vegetables. It has operations in different areas of the country, including Michigan. Defendants are migrant workers from Texas who worked for plaintiff in Ionia, Michigan, during the 1987 season. Defendants were recruited in Texas. Before defendants came to Michigan, the parties executed a number of documents that described the conditions of employment, including housing. Defendants were paid $3.35 an hour and lived in mobile homes…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Michigan State Employees Ass'n v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ShackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Berrybrook Farms, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
- Folgueras v. HassleDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Taylor v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- United Rentals (North America), Inc. v. Jerry Keizer, Grant Rent-All, Inc. And Mulder's Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Ypsilanti Housing Commission v. O'DayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. DeCosterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.