Legal Opinion

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. State

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1995No. Docket 154650, 154651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarilyn Kelly, P.J.

Defendants, the Michigan Department of Mental Health and others, appeal from grants of permanent injunctions in favor of plaintiffs, the uaw and former patients of the Lafayette Clinic. Appealing in consolidated cases, defendants assert that the trial court incorrectly interpreted a number of provisions of the Mental Health Code and the Michigan Constitution. We hold that, under the doctrine of the law of the case, the issues raised in this appeal which were previously decided by our Court may hot be revisited. We find defendants’ other issues to be moot.

i

The facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Locricchio v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  4. CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alliance for the Mentally Ill v. Department of Community HealthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. MS DEV. v. Auto Plaza of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Hussey v. Say.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In Re LooseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ami v. Comm. Health Dept.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API