Legal Opinion
State v. DeCoster
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 23, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
Austin J. DeCoster, d/b/a DeCoster Egg Farms (“DeCoster”) appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Bradford, J.) permanently enjoining conduct that was found to violate the Maine Civil Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 4681 (Supp. 1991) (“Civil Rights Act”) and ordering him to pay the costs and reasonable attorney fees of the plaintiff, the State of Maine. DeCoster contends that the Superior Court erred in finding a violation of the Civil Rights Act and, in the alternative, that the court erred in finding him liable for the civil rights violations committed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Poulin v. Colby CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- United Farm Workers of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. ShackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Judith Ann Petersen v. Talisman Sugar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WeinschenkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Ramirez v. DeCosterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
- Napieralski v. Unity Church of Greater PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Nashef v. AADCO Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.