Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Russell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1991No. 91-110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This appeal ensues from the trial court’s granting a new trial, finding that the damages awarded appellees by the jury were inadequate. The jury damages awarded resulted from a vehicular collision between an automobile driven by appellee Saul Peters and a tractor-trailer parked partially on Highway 63 by appellant George Hamilton. This tractor-trailer rig was owned by appellant Joe Williams. After the initial collision, the Peters’ vehicle then collided with another tractor-trailer which was operated by appellant Robert Coffman, but owned by appellant Continental Baking…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Tennessee Racquetball Investors, Ltd. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  3. The Scott-Burr Stores Corp. v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  4. Carr v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. McKinnon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burnett v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Tirado v. O'HaraCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Williamson v. Baptist Health Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Burnett v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API