Legal Opinion

Tirado v. O'Hara

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 2000No. CA 99-857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. JENNINGS, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ motion for a new trial in a medical malpractice case. Appellant Dr. Emilio Tirado surgically repaired appellee John O’Hara’s hernia in March 1993. During the surgery, appellant placed one stitch through and another one around Mr. O’Hara’s femoral nerve, which damaged the nerve and allegedly caused him to suffer pain in the right leg. At trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Mr. O’Hara and, based on interrogatories, set his damages at a total of $77,332.03. Although the jury also found in favor of Mr. O’Hara’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Razorback Cab of Fort Smith, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Waterfield v. QuimbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Carr v. WoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Smith v. PettitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Saber Manufacturing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bruce v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Travelers Insurance v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Miguel Escobar v. A&A Orchard, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  4. Grubbs v. HindesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Grubbs v. HindesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API