Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Fowler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 31, 1994No. 93-681PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Scott Fowler, the appellee, sued Dr. Robert Burnett, the appellant, for medical malpractice. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Dr. Burnett. The question before us is whether the Trial Court abused his discretion in granting a new trial. We hold there was no abuse of discretion and affirm.

Mr. Fowler broke an ankle playing racquetball. The ankle was repaired using a temporary metal plate and four metal screws to facilitate healing. Dr. Burnett supervised administration of a general anesthetic when Mr. Fowler returned to the hospital to have the metal pieces removed.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Delta School of Commerce, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Schichtl v. SlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Biddle v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. High Plains Genetics Research, Inc. v. J K Mill-Iron RanchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API