Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 23, 1985No. CR 85-81PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

The appellant was convicted

of rape and was sentenced as an habitual offender to imprisonment for 40 years. The sufficiency of the State’s proof is not questioned, it having been shown that McKinnon had engaged by forcible compulsion in deviate sexual activity with a girl (who was eleven years old at the time). Two points for reversal are argued.

First, it is insisted that the prosecution should not have been allowed to cross-examine McKinnon about his past use of aliases. He admitted that he had used the name Steve Owens to conceal his whereabouts from his wife. He…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gordon Arthur Lyda and Albert Francis Perrault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. United States v. MansawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Barry Lee ReidCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Outler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Branscomb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. McKinnon v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Maiden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Russell Hillman McKinnon v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, A.D.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Bonds v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API