Legal Opinion

Samuel Storchheim v. T. Stevens Daugherty

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 22, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences in an interference1 involving appellant’s continuation-in-part application2 of an earlier filed parent application 3 and appellee’s patent,4 awarding priority to the patentee Daugherty.

The invention involved relates to a process for forming aluminum sheet, or the like, by passing preheated aluminum particles between a pair of nip rolls. Claim 11 of the Daugherty patent, which forms the sole count of the interference, reads as follows:

The method of making a continuous length of aluminous metal,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James A. Richards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Lester C. Crome v. Henton MorroghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  2. In re WafmouthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
  5. Edwin J. Smith v. Morris D. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API