Samuel Storchheim v. T. Stevens Daugherty
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences in an interference1 involving appellant’s continuation-in-part application2 of an earlier filed parent application 3 and appellee’s patent,4 awarding priority to the patentee Daugherty.
The invention involved relates to a process for forming aluminum sheet, or the like, by passing preheated aluminum particles between a pair of nip rolls. Claim 11 of the Daugherty patent, which forms the sole count of the interference, reads as follows:
The method of making a continuous length of aluminous metal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James A. Richards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Lester C. Crome v. Henton MorroghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re WafmouthCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Snitzer v. EtzelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- Edwin J. Smith v. Morris D. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.