Legal Opinion
Lester C. Crome v. Henton Morrogh
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 30, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6214PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter in issue in interference No. 85,061 to Henton Morrogh, the appellee in the instant proceeding. The invention involved is a gray cast iron which is defined in the following counts:
“Count 1. Gray cast iron which contains a small proportion of cerium uncombined with sulphur and in which, in its as-cast state, at least the greater part of its graphite content has a nodular microstructure, said iron containing no sulphur…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Lindley v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Keeling v. HeidCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ivar Jepson v. Robert E. Coleman, Jr., and Calvin D. MacCrackenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Wagoner v. BargerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Yuichi Kubota and Ako Watanabe v. Yoshiyuki Shibuya, Shigeo Daimon and Kazuo OkamuraCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Rex Chainbelt Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corporation, Rex Chainbelt Inc. v. Carman Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. SternauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.