Edwin J. Smith v. Morris D. Stone
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences, adhered to on reconsideration, involving appellant’s application 1 and ap-pellee’s patent 2 and awarding priority to the senior party, the patentee Stone.
The subject matter involved in the interference relates to the manufacture of tinplate, i. e., thin strips of steel coated with tin, which are used primarily as a fabrication material for containers (the so-called “tin can”). More specifically, the invention pertains to a method of making “very thin tinplate,” in which the steel substrate has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Martin v. SnyderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Samuel Storchheim v. T. Stevens DaughertyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Aelony v. Urs ArniCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Wetmore v. QuickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re SabatinoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Meitzner v. CorteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.