Legal Opinion
In Re David L. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 29, 1993No. 93-631PublishedCited by 205 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
Respondent was ordered to show cause why he should not be fined, disbarred or otherwise disciplined for filing frivolous appeals in numbers 93-1070 and 93-1139, Deherrera v. Denver, 7 F.3d 1044 (10th Cir.1993) after the entry of this court’s orders in Sandlin v. Canady (In re Canady), 993 F.2d 1551 (10th Cir.1993) and Dunkin v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp., Nos. 92-1230 & 92-1381 (10th Cir. February 11, 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 87, 126 L.Ed.2d 54 (1993) and for filing a frivolous appeal in Casillan v. Regional Transportation District, 986 F.2d 1426 (10th Cir.1993). Respondent…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Pedro v. SpedalieriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Stamps v. Collagen CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. William D. KillionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Tommy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by205 opinions
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Grant v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.