Legal Opinion
United States v. Pedro v. Spedalieri
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1990No. 89-2181PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Pedro V. Spedalieri, was convicted of armed robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and sentenced to fifty-seven months imprisonment. On appeal, Spedalieri argues that the district court erred in 1) denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal on armed robbery (§ 2113(d)) because an actual bomb was not involved, 2) misapprehending its authority to depart downward from the Sentencing Guidelines, and 3) not granting a two-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. We reject Spe-dalieri’s contentions and affirm.
I
Viewing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Gregory J. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Leonard Lloyd (92-2106) Shawn Huffman (92-2108) Darryl Little (92-2146) and Mario Taylor (92-2175)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Roy W. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.