Legal Opinion
United States v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 29, 2008No. 05-2052PublishedCited by 225 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction1
Roland Lorenzo Mitchell filed an untimely notice of appeal of his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. This court dismissed his appeal, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction because Mitchell failed to comply with the time limitations of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b). United States v. Mitchell, 464 F.3d 1149, 1149 (10th Cir.2006). The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded for further consideration in light of Bowles v. Russell, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 2366, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007) (holding…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by225 opinions
- Bylin v. BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Douglas v. WorkmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Phelps v. AlameidaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Leonard OliverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. UrutyanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.