Legal Opinion
United States v. Tommy Berryhill
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1989No. 88-1699PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of plaintiff-appellee United States of America requesting that the court revise its opinion with regard to our remand to the district court to correct its reliance on a repealed statute, the petition is granted. The United States argues that our remand in United States v. Berryhill, 872 F.2d 949 (10th Cir.1989), authored by Barrett, Senior Circuit Judge, was based upon a misconception of the repeal date of 18 U.S.C. § 4205(b)(1). We agree. In our order granting rehearing, we directed that that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WackerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- In Re David L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.