Legal Opinion

Clark v. Kelley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2863PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant Kelley appeals from a judgment against him entered after his default, following the court’s order sustaining a demurrer to his cross-complaint.

In December, 1907, N. C. Kelley executed his promissory note to W. P. Puller & Co. for $2,471.54, and’a't the same time by way of security assigned and delivered to W. P. Puller & Co. three contracts executed by one Owings in favor of Kelley; by which said Owings agreed to purchase from Kelley certain parcels of real property. Subsequently' the notes and contracts were assigned to Willard H. Clark, plaintiff and respondent herein, who, after…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Meyer v. QuiggleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Waugenheim v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Glide v. KayserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Engebretson v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Leslie v. Brown Brothers IncorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cobe v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Reed v. WingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. PeakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API