Legal Opinion

Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. Flavin

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6962PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the affirmance by the Board of Appeals of the final rejection of appellants’ patent application. 1 All of the claims have been rejected as unpatentable over the prior art.

The invention described in the specification relates to halogenated ethenyl sulfones and to their use as pesticides, primarily as fungicides. Broadly, the formula of the sulfones is

in which R is an alkyl group and at least two of X, Y and Z are fluorine, chlorine or bromine. If only two of X, Y and Z are fluorine, chlorine or bromine, the third member is hydrogen. The compounds are said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Victor MillsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. In re HackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Application of SchechterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Commissioner of Patents v. Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals RoesslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  4. Application of John R. StemniskiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Application of Jean P. Rosselet, Oldrich K. Sebek and George B. SperoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API