Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Lodi
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 16, 1989No. TC DA 360332, DA 363890 CA A47872 (Control), CA A48372 SC S36030PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
The Court of Appeals invalidated the City of Portland’s penal ordinance against carrying a concealed pocketknife with a blade beyond a specified length 1 on grounds that the ordinance was preempted by state law, affirming the circuit court’s dismissal of complaints against defendants under the ordinance. City of Portland v. Lodi, 94 Or App 735, 767 P2d 108 (1989). Having granted the City’s petition for review, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The preemption issue arises under Article XI, section 2, of the Oregon Constitution, which authorizes the voters of a city to enact and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. McJunkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Denton Plastics, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.