Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Dollarhide

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1986No. DA 261430; CA A31427; SC S31408; SC S31398PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This case involves the scope of the power granted to cities by one of the home rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution (Art XI, § 2) to enact criminal ordinances which prohibit the same conduct that is prohibited by state law.

In 1983, the Portland City Council adopted section 14.36.065 of the Code of the City of Portland, 1 which defines and prohibits prostitution in terms substantially identical to ORS 163.305,167.002 and 167.007. 2 At the same time, the City Council also adopted a mandatory minimum penalty provision for violation of the prostitution ordinance. 3 There is no mandatory…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. FanusOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API