Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 1992No. DA 396491-8906; CA A64089PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*235RICHARDSON, J.
Defendant was charged with indecent exposure under Portland City Code (PCC) § 14.24.060. He demurred, contending that ORS 163.465 preempts the ordinance. The trial court agreed and dismissed the charge. The city appeals, and we affirm.
PCC § 14.24.060 provides, in part:
“It is unlawful for any person to expose his or her genitalia while in a public place or place visible from a public place, if the public place is open or available to persons of the opposite sex.”
ORS 163.465 provides, in part:
“(1) A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Portland v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MilnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. Lopez-VegaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- City of Dallas v. SullengerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.