Legal Opinion

State v. McJunkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 98CR0822FE; CA A104876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, giving false information to a police officer, and carrying a concealed weapon, specifically, a “dirk or dagger.” ORS 166.240. His single assignment of error is that the trial court should have granted a motion for judgment of acquittal on the concealed weapon charge, because there was no evidence that the weapon that he possessed was a “dirk or dagger.” We agree and reverse the concealed weapon conviction, but otherwise affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute'. Two officers saw defendant walking down the street at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. FredetteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Summerall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
  2. State v. KeckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. RuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. ThrelkeldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API