Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1991No. DA 363899; CA A61733PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*391ROSSMAN, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for unlawful possession of a concealed firearm, ORS 166.250, and for carrying a loaded firearm. Portland City Code § 14.32.010 (PCC). We write to address only two questions:1 (1) whether the Portland ordinance is preempted by the state statute prohibiting concealed firearms possession; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in giving the “witness false in part” jury instruction. We answer both questions in the negative and affirm defendant’s convictions.

On February 24,1988, Portland Police Officer Nelson received a report from his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ireland v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Harlow v. ClowOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. MilnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Kendricks v. Mychal Thompson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API