Legal Opinion

Hill v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1961No. 38,176PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Faribault County denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The questions presented were certified to this court as important and doubtful.

The action is based upon an alleged creation of a nuisance in the operation of defendant’s canning factory. Prior to the commencement of this action, two separate actions were brought by other property owners in the vicinity of plaintiff’s property. In one action, Merrill H. Hall recovered a verdict in the sum of $1,350. Judgment was entered thereon, payment made, and the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Gammel v. Ernst & ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. House v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Aldrich v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Radmacher v. CardinalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Pierce v. Foley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Kelsey v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. North Star Legal Foundation v. Honeywell ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API