Legal Opinion
Pierce v. Foley Bros., Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 1969No. 41165PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County dated September 12, 1967, as amended October 9, 1967, denying the motion of defendant-appellant for summary judgment and certifying a particular question as important and doubtful pursuant to Minn. St. 605.09 (i).
About June 28, 1962, and for some time prior to that date, defendant, Foley Bros., Inc., engaged in the general pipeline business in the State of Montana in a partnership or joint venture with the Shamrock Construction Company under the business name of Foley-Shamrock Construction Company, maintaining offices…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Crider v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lorshbough v. Township of BuzzleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Rodwell v. Pro Football, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- F. & H. Investment Co. v. Sackman-Gilliland Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.