Legal Opinion

Radmacher v. Cardinal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1962No. 38,398PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court striking from the answer of appellant, third-party defendant, Benjamin Chesin, allegations of estoppel by verdict arising out of a cross-suit for contribution brought by respondent, third-party plaintiff, James Cardinal.

This litigation arises out of a collision between a car driven by Chesin in which plaintiff, Rudolph Radmacher, was a passenger, and a car driven by Cardinal. In a previous action Chesin sued Cardinal for personal injuries and property damage and Cardinal counterclaimed for property damage. The verdict awarded Chesin…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. American Automobile Insurance v. MollingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Grothe Ex Rel. Grothe v. ShafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Spitzack v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Nitz v. NitzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Anderson v. GabrielsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API