Legal Opinion
North Star Legal Foundation v. Honeywell Project
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1984No. C8-84-725PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellants appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Appellants assert their claims were legally sufficient. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
On April 18 and October 24,1983, several hundred persons were arrested at the Minneapolis headquarters of Honeywell, Inc. for violation of the Minnesota criminal trespass statute. Subsequently, appellants brought a suit in the district court as taxpayers on behalf of the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County seeking damages and injunctive relief in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Abbariao v. Hamline University School of LawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sununu v. Clamshell AllianceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Hill v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Martin v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- County of San Luis Obispo v. Abalone AllianceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Milk Purchaser Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Energy & Air Systems, Inc. v. KuettelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.