Legal Opinion

Murphy v. City of Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1925PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdaiis, J.

By their demurrers tbe defendants denounce in limine tbe plaintiffs’ alleged right to maintain their suit. Tbey assert tbat tbe cause of action existed primarily in tbe city and tbat tbe plaintiffs must fail because tbey neglected to apply, to tbe city council to prevent or to correct tbe evil of which tbey complain — tbat tbey should have sought relief through tbe municipality before applying therefor to a court of equity.

When a person becomes a stockholder in a corporation be assents to tbe execution of all tbe powers wbicb tbe law confers upon tbe corporation and agrees to abide by tbe…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. von Arnim v. American Tube WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Merrimon v. Paving Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Sandlin v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Huntington v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Brumley v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API