Legal Opinion
Brumley v. . Baxter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided December 17, 1945PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This was an action to restrain the City of Charlotte from executing deed without monetary consideration conveying certain real property, owned by the city, to the Charlotte Veterans' Recreation Center, under authority of ch. 460, Public Laws 1945 (herein referred to as Senate Bill No. 154).
On the hearing below it was agreed that the plaintiff is a citizen, resident and taxpayer of the City of Charlotte; that the City of Charlotte has a population of more than one hundred thousand inhabitants according to the last Federal census, and that defendant H. H. Baxter is the mayor, and Lillian R.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Wells v. Housing Authority of the City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Morrissey v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.