Legal Opinion

Hill v. Erwin Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1954No. 739PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendants and each of them interposed a demurrer in this Court to the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; for that (1) the plaintiff is not entitled to maintain in his own right an action to restrain a threatened loss not peculiar to himself without allegation that he exhausted his remedies within the corporation before resorting to suit; (2) the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain the intervention of the court to impose his own judgment in a matter reserved to the discretion and judgment of the officers and board…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Caldwell v. EubanksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  5. Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API