Legal Opinion

Doe v. Rodgers, M.H.A.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 9, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1229PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS F. HOGAN, Senior District Judge

This lawsuit was commenced by Dr. John Doe and Dr. Doe’s limited liability company (“the plaintiffs”) to recover damages and secure declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the National Practitioner Data Bank, and three officials who administer the National Practitioner Data Bank (collectively “the defendants”). The plaintiffs allege that the defendants unlawfully accepted, maintained, and continue to release an inaccurate, fraudulent and untimely Adverse Action Report that,…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alemu v. Dep't of For-Hire VehiclesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Robinson v. E. Carolina Univ.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018
  3. Telescope Media Group v. LindseyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  4. Shume v. Pearson Educ. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Alday v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API